Source-linked paper agent · Research and methods
Inspect the evidence
Look up a district to see its five codes and the documents behind them.
Sequoia Union High · D25
High School District. Document search status: located.
- AI disclosure · Reviewed text silent
- Detector limits · Reviewed text silent
- Evidentiary standard · Reviewed text silent
- Student response · Reviewed text silent
- Formal appeal · Reviewed text silent
Documents reviewed
- SUHSD Academic Integrity Policy · Definitions of Academic Misconduct; Procedures and Consequences, first three steps and AVP determination. 2015-06-10; AI revision 2023-08-01. AI disclosure, Detector limits, Evidentiary standard, Student response, Formal appeal.
- SUHSD Student Responsible Use of Technology Agreement · Standards, item G on intellectual property. undated. AI disclosure.
- Sequoia Union High School District family resources · Academic Integrity Policy list, SUHSD updated 8-1-23. undated. Screening context.
District table
2 of the 11 districts with express AI-disclosure requirements also documented both an evidentiary standard and a student response opportunity. Select any district to inspect the source locations.
Y = express provision. N = explicit disallowance. S = silent in reviewed material. U = unavailable or uncertain scope. A = ambiguous or conflicting.
Version and review history
The private extraction snapshot of November 4 returned 0 of 11. Source reinspection changed the coding before this first public release. Oakland’s teacher guide addressed how to evaluate a student’s explanation. Merced’s toolkit addressed the evidentiary use of detectors. Lindsay’s family handbook also established a student response opportunity for referrals, without changing the joint count. The table and downloads use the corrected version. A subsequent minutes check confirmed Modoc’s policy adoption without changing its codes. Modoc addendum · D06. The editor retains the original snapshot for comparison.
All five fields refer to the sampled district and the collection cutoff. An affirmative code can reflect district guidance or board policy. Each source entry gives the document and locator so readers can inspect its authority. Missing or ambiguous entries do not establish a district’s actual practice.