Source-linked paper agent · Research and methods
Inspect the evidence
Look up a district to see its five codes and the documents behind them.
Whittier Union High · D18
High School District. Document search status: uncertain.
- AI disclosure · Unavailable or uncertain scope
- Detector limits · Unavailable or uncertain scope
- Evidentiary standard · Unavailable or uncertain scope
- Student response · Unavailable or uncertain scope
- Formal appeal · Unavailable or uncertain scope
Documents reviewed
- Whittier Union Welcomes 2026–27 School Year with Renewed Commitment to Excellence · District policy announcement, paragraphs beginning with the debut of AI guiding principles. August 2026 school reopening. Screening context.
- Whittier Union board policy index, Instruction · 6163.4 BP/AR, Student Use of Technology. Undated listing. Screening context.
- Whittier Union Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 6163.4 · Student Use of Technology, usage terms and agreement. Policy and regulation renumbered February 8, 2011. Screening context.
District table
2 of the 11 districts with express AI-disclosure requirements also documented both an evidentiary standard and a student response opportunity. Select any district to inspect the source locations.
Y = express provision. N = explicit disallowance. S = silent in reviewed material. U = unavailable or uncertain scope. A = ambiguous or conflicting.
Version and review history
The private extraction snapshot of November 4 returned 0 of 11. Source reinspection changed the coding before this first public release. Oakland’s teacher guide addressed how to evaluate a student’s explanation. Merced’s toolkit addressed the evidentiary use of detectors. Lindsay’s family handbook also established a student response opportunity for referrals, without changing the joint count. The table and downloads use the corrected version. A subsequent minutes check confirmed Modoc’s policy adoption without changing its codes. Modoc addendum · D06. The editor retains the original snapshot for comparison.
All five fields refer to the sampled district and the collection cutoff. An affirmative code can reflect district guidance or board policy. Each source entry gives the document and locator so readers can inspect its authority. Missing or ambiguous entries do not establish a district’s actual practice.