Source-linked paper agent · Research and methods
Inspect the evidence
Look up a district to see its five codes and the documents behind them.
Lindsay Unified · D14
Unified School District. Document search status: located.
- AI disclosure · Express provision
- Detector limits · Reviewed text silent
- Evidentiary standard · Reviewed text silent
- Student response · Express provision
- Formal appeal · Express provision
Documents reviewed
- Lindsay Unified Family and Learner Handbook · Printed p. 36 (PDF p. 37), What Are My Child’s Rights?, explanation before a penalty; printed p. 65 (PDF p. 66), Discipline/Corrective Plan; printed p. 71 (PDF p. 72), technology attribution. 2026–27. AI disclosure, Student response, Formal appeal.
- Lindsay Unified Progressive Discipline Guide · Discipline Guidelines, printed p. 9, Minor Forgery/or Plagiarism and administrator referral; Suspension and Expulsion, Due Process in School Discipline. Reviewed July 2026. Formal appeal, Evidentiary standard, Student response, Detector limits.
- District Student Services · Family and Learner Handbook and Discipline Guide links. Undated. Screening context.
District table
2 of the 11 districts with express AI-disclosure requirements also documented both an evidentiary standard and a student response opportunity. Select any district to inspect the source locations.
Y = express provision. N = explicit disallowance. S = silent in reviewed material. U = unavailable or uncertain scope. A = ambiguous or conflicting.
Version and review history
The private extraction snapshot of November 4 returned 0 of 11. Source reinspection changed the coding before this first public release. Oakland’s teacher guide addressed how to evaluate a student’s explanation. Merced’s toolkit addressed the evidentiary use of detectors. Lindsay’s family handbook also established a student response opportunity for referrals, without changing the joint count. The table and downloads use the corrected version. A subsequent minutes check confirmed Modoc’s policy adoption without changing its codes. Modoc addendum · D06. The editor retains the original snapshot for comparison.
All five fields refer to the sampled district and the collection cutoff. An affirmative code can reflect district guidance or board policy. Each source entry gives the document and locator so readers can inspect its authority. Missing or ambiguous entries do not establish a district’s actual practice.