Persistent identity
The Crossref DOI remains the canonical identifier for the scholarly work and resolves to one maintained article landing page.
JournalOS scholarly infrastructure
The Agentic Scholarly Record is an open companion profile for scholarship with an interactive research agent. It binds the agent to the article's canonical DOI, exact version, editorial history, rights, evidence, evaluations and preservation status—without replacing the DOI or the human scholarly record.
Public discovery finding
22 September 2026
A review of the publicly indexed web found no other independently verifiable peer-reviewed journal system built and hosted with ChatGPT Sites. JournalOS therefore uses the narrow, auditable description “the first publicly documented ChatGPT Sites-hosted agent-native journal platform”—not the unverifiable claim that no private, unindexed or undisclosed system exists.
One work · four accountable layers
DOI infrastructure already supplies globally recognized persistent identity. JournalOS adds what an agent-native article needs: a portable, inspectable representation of the source, decisions, permissions, model boundary and preservation state.
The Crossref DOI remains the canonical identifier for the scholarly work and resolves to one maintained article landing page.
JATS XML, accessible HTML, PDF, contributor metadata, disclosures and references describe the same versioned work.
Rights, editorial history, source hashes, model identity, retrieval scope, evaluations, limitations and update status travel together.
The agent answers from the locked source, cites exact evidence and refuses questions the record cannot support.
DOI integrity rules
A DOI is displayed only after registration through an authorized Registration Agency. Each DOI resolves to one maintained, work-specific landing page.
A Creative Commons mirror retains the source DOI, canonical URL, authorship and exact license. Adding an agent does not manufacture a second article DOI.
The agent manifest receives a resolvable URI and content hashes, then declares its relationship to the DOI and article version.
Corrections, expressions of concern, retractions and agent refreshes remain visible, dated and linked across every representation.
Portable by design
Every implementation must expose the same minimum evidence, regardless of model provider, journal platform or commercial relationship.
01
DOI, canonical URL, title, version, status, ORCID, ROR and CRediT roles.
02
Copyright holder, exact license deed, canonical source, evidence and verification date.
03
Decision authority, review model, dates, conflicts, ethics, data and AI-use disclosures.
04
Source and policy hashes, provider, model, retrieval boundary and citation mode.
05
Last evaluation date, evidence-grounding results, known limitations and refusal behavior.
06
Deposit status, preservation service, export formats, corrections and retractions.
Governance charter
Dr. Freedom Cheteni serves as founding convener and Network Editor-in-Chief. Editorial authority remains human; an open standard cannot belong to one editor, vendor or model provider.
Technical, metadata, preservation, ethics, library and community representatives disclose affiliations and conflicts.
Material profile changes use versioned proposals, public rationale and compatibility notes.
Standards governance defines interoperability. Journal boards exercise disclosed, delegated review authority; the Editor-in-Chief retains final accountability.
Platform revenue, consortium participation and editorial acceptance remain institutionally separated.
Credential truth policy
JournalOS does not imply an ISSN, Crossref membership, DOI deposit, DOAJ inclusion, COPE membership, preservation deposit or independent standards endorsement until each claim is verified. The requirements on this page define the Agentic Scholarly Record profile; they are not badges or claims of accreditation.
Founding invitation
JournalOS invites open publishing platforms, identifier stewards, standards bodies, libraries, societies and journals to establish a neutral working group for agent-native scholarly records. Participants retain their systems, brands, policies and editorial authority.
The shared work is deliberately narrow: agree on a portable manifest, validate it on real articles, publish compatibility tests and pursue community standardization through recognized infrastructure.
01
PKP / OJS · Janeway · PubPub · Kotahi / Coko
Prove that one portable agent record can move across editorial systems without platform lock-in.
Open the OJS community02
Crossref · DataCite · ORCID · ROR
Define durable relationships among the article DOI, people, institutions, data and the agent manifest.
Crossref working groups03
NISO · COPE · DOAJ
Test JATS compatibility, editorial safeguards, transparent corrections and open-access expectations.
Inspect NISO JATS04
Editors · librarians · publishers · research communities
Pilot the profile on real articles and help govern it independently of any one journal or vendor.
Bring a pilot journalPrestige before scale
Selected journals test interoperability, accessibility, preservation and governance against published acceptance criteria.
JATS, metadata, files, history and agent manifests remain portable; adoption cannot create a new walled garden.
A preservation deposit and correction path matter more than an impressive interface or model demonstration.
Public evidence includes review dates, decision times, correction performance, rights verification and agent evaluation—not invented impact metrics.
Operational rights, review, correction and agent rules remain independently inspectable in the JournalOS Trust Center.
Platform record
JournalOS credits Freedom Cheteni for conceptualization, project administration and supervision. Imported scholarship retains its original identifiers and authorship.