Higher income individuals are more generous when local economic inequality is high

Joel H Suss

PLOS ONE · 2023-06-14
Research article · Version of record retained in Europe PMC · CC BY 4.0 · 5,631 words

Original source: Volume 18 · Issue 6

Read article Ask paper agent

Ask this paper

Full manuscript text
Source-linked passage retrieval

Paper Agent

Agent platform credit

Dr. Freedom Cheteni · Editor in Chief

Research University Journal · JournalOS conception and editorial stewardship

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3507-0094

This ORCID identifies the human contributor to the agent platform. Source-paper authors retain their own authorship and identifiers.

Manuscript & source record

Title: Higher income individuals are more generous when local economic inequality is high
Authors / creators: Joel H Suss
Source: Complete manuscript edition 2026-11-05
Editorial record: Attributed Creative Commons source edition. Original publication and authorship remain with the source. Hosting is not a new peer-review decision.

Searches this article’s preserved text and returns exact passages. This agent searches this article’s preserved text; it does not create investment advice.

Attribution, rights & verification

Original authors / creators: Joel H Suss
Original publication: PLOS ONE · PLOS · 2023-06-14
Source & version: Authoritative source ↗ · Version of record retained in Europe PMC
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286273
License & retained notices: CC BY 4.0
© 2023 Joel H. Suss
Article-specific license evidence ↗
Exact license notice
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Article-specific XML license URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Edition changes: Narrative text edition with normalized whitespace. Figures, tables, display equations and separately licensed material are omitted; consult the preserved XML and original publisher for definitive content.
Evidence limits: Adjacent research, not a directly sampled family-office study. Applicability to a family office requires separate assessment. Applicability is limited to the source study setting, sample and design; it does not directly study family offices. Proposed family-office applications require separate evaluation.
Retraction / correction check: No linked notice identified in retrieved XML or Crossref relation/update-to fields. Article-specific repository XML related-article links, Crossref DOI relation/update-to fields, and a bounded publisher-page notice search where accessible; unavailable pages and unregistered/unlinked notices remain coverage limits. Verified 2026-11-05. Automated/source checks are not human peer review.
Preserved record: Rights and full text checked 2026-11-05. Included in this volume on 2026-11-05. Original source dates remain unchanged.
Download the preserved source
SHA-256 (retrieved artifact): d2575d1b9b8e512254334549490689be1f57e24a366544c64caceea01354228c
SHA-256 (preserved text edition): e604d01784eb8cb88b0162647c3ecd5fa53d9c3c7b020d4cc5eb11d554ba51aa