Report · Preserved source identity

Ivy+ Text Data Mining Education for Advocacy (TEA) Task Force Phase One Report: Actions and Interventions to Address Concerns with Text Data Mining Platforms

Whitney Kramer; Iliana Burgos; Evan Muzzall; Emily Esten; Jajwalya Karajgikar; Ece Turnator; William Shaw; Ashley Champagne; Hugh Truslow

Stanford Digital Repository · Version 5 · 2023-03-10 (deposit)

Attribution & source history

Kramer, W., Burgos, I., Muzzall, E., Esten, E., Karajgikar, J., Turnator, E., Shaw, W., Champagne, A., & Truslow, H. (2023). Ivy+ Text Data Mining Education for Advocacy (TEA) Task Force Phase One Report: Actions and Interventions to Address Concerns with Text Data Mining Platforms [Unpublished Manuscript]. Text Education for Advocacy Task Force, IvyPlus Digital Scholarship Affinity Group.

Source version: 5. Local hosting record: 2026-10-16. repository-deposited version; peer-review status not established by deposit.

Source contributors and date events

Whitney Kramer · author

Iliana Burgos · author

Evan Muzzall · author

deposit · publication · 2023-03-10

creation · creation · 2023-03-10

publication · publication · 2023-03-10

An independently curated Research University Press collection of Stanford-hosted sources. This collection does not assert Stanford University ownership, sponsorship, endorsement or transfer of source publishing authority.

Rights & identifiers

CC BY 4.0 · Checked 2026-10-16

Version-specific source metadata and rights ↗

User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.

No DOI supplied in the source citation. Registry and responsible-publisher checks are required before any first registration. Hosting and adding an agent do not make this a new original article or establish authority to register a replacement DOI.

not established; repository metadata is not a retraction registry. This source check is not a new peer review or an endorsement of the findings.