Parenting Journal · Parenting & AI · Volume 2 · Issue 5

Growing Wise Together

One hundred readings on parenting, children and AI. Explore the system type, study context and limits alongside each source.

100 articles · Page 5 of 5

Edition list · CSV ↓
81

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Naturalistic observational content study

How US Youth Use AI Chatbots: Conversation Patterns From Naturalistic Keystroke Observations

What might my child be seeking when an AI conversation feels supportive or friend-like?

Parent-reported ages 1–17; most users 10–17; ages below 10 especially uncertainCC BY 4.0Contemporary generative AI chatbots and companions; observational use, not an interventionChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
82

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Within-participant question-design experiment

Emotional Reactions and Likelihood of Response to Questions Designed for a Mental Health Chatbot Among Adolescents: Experimental Study

Which ways of asking about feelings help my teenager feel comfortable rather than interrogated?

14–17 yearsCC BY 4.0Hypothetical chatbot interface and prewritten questions; no live GenAIChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
83

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Pilot randomized feasibility trial with clinician interviews

Chatbot-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adolescents With Depression and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

What support around a teen chatbot matters as much as the chatbot itself?

13–17 yearsCC BY 4.0Constrained NLP/ML therapeutic conversational agent with human clinical oversight; not established as GenAIChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
84

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Two school experiments on first-encounter relationship design

Getting acquainted: First steps for child-robot relationship formation

When a robot says it likes the same things as my child, how might that shape what my child shares?

8–10 years in study 1; 8–11 in study 2CC BY (version not stated)Wizard-of-Oz pilot plus autonomous speech-recognition social robot with constrained dialogueChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
85

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Qualitative formative acceptability study

Improving the Well-being of Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study Exploring Acceptability and Clinical Usability of a Self-compassion Chatbot

What would make digital self-compassion support feel relevant to my teen’s real daily challenges?

12–16 yearsCC BY 4.0Rule-based lessons plus explicitly reported limited AI recognition of emotions, management status and risk words; demonstrated prototypeChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
86

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Repeated-interaction observational robot study

The Effects of Social Presence and Familiarity on Children–Robot Interactions

If my child becomes more comfortable with a familiar robot, what does that closeness mean?

Eligible 6–12 years; analyzed mean 10.79 years (SD 1.12)CC BY 4.0Autonomous social robot with basic NLP and preprogrammed adaptive activitiesChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
87

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Retrospective longitudinal observational analysis

Adolescents’ Well-being While Using a Mobile Artificial Intelligence–Powered Acceptance Commitment Therapy Tool: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study

When a support chatbot reports that users feel better, how can I judge what caused the change?

Advertised to 14–18-year-olds; actual ages and gender were not collected or verifiedCC BY 4.0Automated ACT conversational service with human distress handoff; model architecture unspecifiedChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
88

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Terminated randomized trial implementation report

Challenges in Implementing a Mobile AI Chatbot Intervention for Depression Among Youth on Psychiatric Waiting Lists: Randomized Controlled Study Termination Report

Could a supposedly convenient digital support tool add demands when my teenager is already overwhelmed?

Planned eligibility 12–18 yearsCC BY 4.0Planned AI/ACT chatbot intervention; architecture unspecified and no evaluable treatment exposureChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
89

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Participatory-design validation and within-child task study

Do different robot appearances change emotion recognition in children with ASD?

Does a child looking longer at a robot mean the child is learning to understand people’s emotions?

Validation eligibility 5–10 years; design work involved children 3–9CC BY 4.0Remotely controlled social robot with automated behavior measurementChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
90

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Exploratory longitudinal field-study reanalysis

A Long-Term Study of Young Children's Rapport, Social Emulation, and Language Learning With a Peer-Like Robot Playmate in Preschool

When my young child imitates a friendly robot, what might they be learning about language and relationships?

4–6 yearsCC BY (version not stated)Teleoperated peer-like storytelling robot with recorded speech and constrained choicesChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
91

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Socially Assistive Robots for Pain Management and Emotional Responses in Pediatric Hospital Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Does evidence that a hospital robot eases pain also mean it reliably reduces fear or distress?

Eligibility under 19; included trials reported ages 2–19, predominantly school-ageCC BY 4.0Mixed scripted, teleoperated, hybrid and autonomous socially assistive robotsChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
92

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Field study with pre/post measures and nonrandom participation

Socially assistive robots in child healthcare: evaluating internal and external emotion regulation interventions

Would my child prefer breathing guidance, physical comfort or simply observing during a stressful procedure?

8–12 years; mean 8.8CC BY 4.0Human-triggered preprogrammed social robot; no generative or adaptive conversationChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
93

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Single-arm pre/post quantitative clinical study

Effectiveness of Socially Assistive Robots in Promoting Positive Emotional Responses and Alleviating Postoperative Pain Among Children: Quantitative Study

How can I tell whether a comforting robot changed my child’s pain, mood or both?

4–12 years; mean 7.35CC BY 4.0Wizard-of-Oz socially assistive robot plus automated facial-expression measurementChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
94

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Single-arm six-week school feasibility pilot

A Robot-Delivered Training Program to Improve Children’s Mental Health and Resilience in Dutch Primary Schools: Pilot Intervention Study

If my child enjoys a school robot buddy, what would show that the support helps beyond enjoyment?

8–12 years; mean 9.9CC BY 4.0Structured robot-delivered psychological training with tablet responses; no GenAI evaluatedChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
95

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Randomized human-versus-robot task comparison

Body Knowledge and Emotion Recognition in Preschool Children: A Comparative Study of Human Versus Robot Tutors

What can a robot emotion-recognition activity teach my preschooler, and what remains a human relationship task?

Approximately 3–6 years (recruited 3 years 3 months–6 years 1 month)CC BY 4.0Fully teleoperated NAO with matched recorded speech and programmed actionsChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
96

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Qualitative conversation analysis of an experimental video dataset

Robot-Mediated Inclusive Processes in Groups of Children: From Gaze Aversion to Mutual Smiling Gaze

Can a shared activity with a robot open a small opportunity to include a child who is new to the group?

School children; mean 10.46 years (SD 0.67)CC BY (version not stated)Programmed/adaptive game-mediating social robot; qualitative analysis, not GenAIChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
97

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Within-participant comparative pilot

Can Robotic Systems Promote Self-Disclosure in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder? A Pilot Study

Could a predictable robot help my autistic teenager begin talking about an uncomfortable experience?

Adolescents; ASD mean 15.91 years, comparison mean 15.73; full range not stated in methodsCC BY 4.0Teleoperated android and simple humanoid with scripted emotional-disclosure interviewsChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
98

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Repeated-session observational comparison and parent interviews

Effects of Parental Involvement in Robot-Assisted Autism Therapy

What role should I have when my child is offered robot-assisted social or emotional activities?

5–12 yearsCC BY 4.0Wizard-of-Oz delivery of programmed NAO activities within therapist-led careDirect parenting evidence
Read & explore ↗
99

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Longitudinal qualitative case study with reflexive video analysis

Exploring companion robots for children with autism spectrum disorder: a reflexive thematic analysis in specialist dental care

How would we recognize when a comforting robot is helping my child and when it is getting in the way?

5–10 yearsCC BY 4.0Simple sensor-reactive companion robot cat; no conversational GenAIChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
100

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Kindness · Qualitative child-and-caregiver needs assessment

Exploring the needs of children and caregivers to inform design of an artificial intelligence-enhanced social robot in the pediatric emergency department

What would my child and I want a hospital support robot to do before we trusted it near a difficult procedure?

Children 5–11 years; caregivers were adultsCC BY 4.0Proposed adaptive AI-enhanced social robot; qualitative design study, no live AI interventionDirect parenting evidence
Read & explore ↗

Study designs and age labels describe the source. Read each study’s findings and limitations before applying them to your family.