Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 5 · Licensed source edition
Can Robotic Systems Promote Self-Disclosure in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder? A Pilot Study
Originally published 2018-02-09 · Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00036 ↗
AI / system type
Teleoperated android and simple humanoid with scripted emotional-disclosure interviews
Child-facing evidenceExamines children or child-focused systems. Transfer to everyday family life must be assessed separately.
The AI connection
ACTROID-F and CommU were teleoperated through controlled interview scripts. The responsive partner included a hidden human; this was not autonomous AI counseling.
Why this reading matters
Provides direct adolescent evidence about disclosure and perceived social pressure without treating machine disclosure as inherently therapeutic.
Editorial reading guide · Kindness
Could a predictable robot help my autistic teenager begin talking about an uncomfortable experience?
Explores why some autistic teens may find a simpler conversational partner easier to approach. Autistic participants disclosed more words overall, and about embarrassment, to the simple robot than to the human; the android did not show the same advantage. More words cannot establish emotional relief, meaningful reciprocity or better conversations with people later.
Study context
11 autistic and eight typically developing adolescents each talked with an android, a simple humanoid and a human interviewer in randomized order.
Age / stage: Adolescents; ASD mean 15.91 years, comparison mean 15.73; full range not stated in methods
Read with three questions
- Why did results differ between the visually simple robot and the more humanlike android?
- What does counting disclosed words capture, and what does it miss about feeling heard or receiving useful help?
- How do teleoperation, one brief encounter and possible carryover limit conclusions about autonomous support and human-to-human transfer?
Keep the limits in view
19 participants, brief scripted interviews and a narrow autistic sample; human interviewer characteristics and within-person carryover may affect responses. No habituation, privacy consequence, emotional benefit or transfer to everyday human relationships was tested. Both robots were remotely operated while participants were encouraged to perceive autonomy.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Hirokazu Kumazaki; Zachary Warren; Amy Swanson; Yuichiro Yoshikawa; Yoshio Matsumoto; Hideyuki Takahashi; Nilanjan Sarkar; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Masaru Mimura; Yoshio Minabe; Mitsuru Kikuchi (2018). Can Robotic Systems Promote Self-Disclosure in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder? A Pilot Study Frontiers in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00036
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.