← Trust · 20 readings

Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition

The Impact of Perceived Algorithmic Control on Gig Workers’ Turnover Intention: Mediating Roles of Perceived Usefulness and Psychological Contract Breach

Originally published 2026-05-13 · Behavioral Sciences
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) · DOI 10.3390/bs16050764 ↗

TrustMulti-phase questionnaire and configurational analysisCC BY 4.0
Ask this paper · Find source passages →

AI / system type

Perceived algorithmic control in gig platforms

Workplace evidence

Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.

The AI connection

System or context examined: Perceived algorithmic control in gig platforms. Algorithmic management/control is not assumed to be machine learning or generative AI.

Why this reading matters

The reading brings psychological contract breach, time pressure and algorithmic control into a concrete discussion of humane work during technological change. It offers multi-phase questionnaire and configurational analysis evidence or analysis, not a promise of organizational or family benefit.

Workplace evidence

Work, care and the whole person.

The workplace lens is psychological contract breach, time pressure and algorithmic control. Source setting or population: Gig workers participating in a platform-work survey. Parenting and child-development outcomes are not inferred from the workplace evidence.

Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.

Editorial reading guide · Trust

What promises do workers believe a platform has made to them?

This multi-phase questionnaire and configurational analysis examines psychological contract breach, time pressure and algorithmic control. Its TRICK home is Trust, an editorial reading path rather than a claim that the paper tests the full framework.

Study context

Gig workers participating in a platform-work survey

Age / stage: Adult workplace context; no child age range inferred

Read with three questions

  1. What promises do workers believe a platform has made to them?
  2. What do this study’s design and population — Gig workers participating in a platform-work survey — allow you to infer about another workplace?
  3. When considering psychological contract breach, time pressure and algorithmic control, which decisions would need employee input before applying this reading to a working family’s circumstances?

Keep the limits in view

Turnover intentions and perceived contract breach are observational measures, not actual departures or evidence that control is beneficial.

The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.

Opening the verified paper and agent…

Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.

Open the repository record

Attribution & reuse

Follow the original.

Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.

Anbo Wu; Shihao Zhang; Linhui Sun; Xiaofang Yuan; Xinping Wang (2026). The Impact of Perceived Algorithmic Control on Gig Workers’ Turnover Intention: Mediating Roles of Perceived Usefulness and Psychological Contract Breach Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050764

Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.