Actionable companion · Learning design & outcomes

Learning with agency: Power optimization of a photovoltaic system with artificial intelligence algorithms over two seasons in tropical area

AI-assisted editorial implementation guide, separate from the original research. Proposed actions are not claims or recommendations attributed to the source authors. No independent peer review of this guide is asserted.

Evidence and context

Title and abstract screening; stage labels describe reported settings, not verified numerical ages. Design labels require full-text appraisal. Reported stage(s): Secondary school. Verify the participant population and task before transferring the findings.

Original authors’ abstract, reproduced under the linked source license:

Highlights • A real electrical characteristics of photovoltaic panel are used for learning and validation of the controllers. • A comparative study of the methods in two different season is done. • ANFIS gives best performance in weather conditions compared to the ANN. Keywords: Artificial Neural Network, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System, Photovoltaic, Maximum Power Point Tracking Abbreviations: ANN, Artificial Neural Network; ANFIS, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Interence System; PV, Photovoltaic; MPPT, Maximum Power Point Tracking Method name: Power Optimization of a Photovoltaic System with Artificial Intelligence Algorithms over two seasons in tropical area Abstract Power output from the PV module changes continuously with time depending upon the climatic condition. This changes are most important in tropical area like Senegal due to the variation of the seasons (dry and rainy). Furthermore, different types of maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm are presented in literature in order to get maximum output from the PV system. They can be summarized in two categories: classical and intelligent methods. The classical methods in no uniform weather condition are not efficient and an important loss of energy is showed. However, faced to this problematics like energy loss and no uniform weather conditions an Adaptative methods is used to optimize the PVs energy. In this study, two intelligent controllers based on artificial neural networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) are proposed to optimize the PVs production in non-uniform weather conditions and compared in order to show the most powerful model. For the ANN, the main challenge is to find the optimal neural in the hidden layer and in the paper, it is obtained using evaluator factor like mean squared error (MSE). These techniques using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are used for power optimization of a photovoltaic system are trained and validated with real data from a photovoltaic micro power plant in dry and rainy season installed at polytechnic high school of Dakar. The performances of the controllers to optimize the PVs power are evaluated during the dry and rainy seasons. Simulation results show that the ANFIS MPPT controller is more efficient and robust than ANN in non-uniform weather conditions. They have the ability of generalization and adaption to each meteorological conditions. These bullet summarize the applied methodology • A real electrical characteristics of photovoltaic panel are used for learning and validation of the controllers. • A comparative study of the methods in two different season is done. • ANFIS gives best performance in weather conditions compared to the ANN.

A 90-day district pilot

1. Days 1–15 · Appraise. Have the curriculum lead and a teacher read the methods and limitations. Record the study design, sample, comparator, outcomes and evidence gaps. Define a local question that the study can help inform.
2. Days 16–30 · Design. Ask learners to attempt a problem unaided, compare an agent hint, explain a revision and verify the final reasoning against a trusted source. Make the permitted use explicit for each assignment. Name an accountable owner and set the baseline, success threshold and budget before implementation.
3. Days 31–60 · Test. Start with a small voluntary cohort, preserve an accessible non-AI route and require teacher review. Use synthetic or de-identified examples; approve data handling and tool terms through district processes.
4. Days 61–90 · Decide. Measure unaided transfer and delayed retention, calibration of confidence and the ability to identify an incorrect AI explanation. Record whether help-seeking becomes answer copying. Compare with baseline, document uncertainty and stop or revise if learning worsens, access is unequal or critical errors persist.

The board decision brief

Report the learning problem, evidence quality, participating population, total cost including review time, measured benefit, errors, access differences and remaining uncertainties. Make a dated recommendation to stop, revise or expand. A positive perception survey alone does not establish learning improvement.

Attribution and reuse

Amadou BA; Alphousseyni NDIAYE; El hadji Mbaye NDIAYE; Senghane MBODJI. Power optimization of a photovoltaic system with artificial intelligence algorithms over two seasons in tropical area. MethodsX (2022-12-10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101959

Companion prepared 2026-10-30. Original authorship and DOI are preserved. The abstract is an attributed source extract; the implementation plan is new AI-assisted editorial material, offered under the same CC BY 4.0 license. This guide has not undergone independent peer review.