From leadership research to district action: Engaging With Hospital Staff to Develop Implementation Strategies For Delivering a Patient Falls Prevention Education Program Using a World Café

AI-assisted editorial implementation guide. Proposed district actions are separate from the original authors’ findings and recommendations. Independent peer review of this guide is not asserted.

Read source Search paper agent CC BY 4.0

Evidence and transfer

Education-related source: verify which participants, institutions and outcomes were actually studied before district adoption. Source publication type: research-article. License and identity checks do not establish study quality or causality.

Original authors’ abstract, reproduced under the source license:

Abstract Background: Hospital falls can be reduced through patient and staff education, yet limited evidence exists about how staff can systematically implement patient falls prevention education. Planning implementation with staff may enhance their acceptance, engagement, and delivery of falls education to hospital patients. Objective: The objective of the study was to design an implementation plan with hospital staff to guide the successful delivery of patient falls education. Methods: Three participatory workshops using a world café methodology were conducted in 1 Western Australian and 2 Victorian hospitals. Participants were presented with information about a patient falls education program called “Safe Recovery” and discussed program implementation strategies. Conversation topics were staff education and training needs, ward support, and organizational requirements. Table discussions were captured on paper and analyzed iteratively at the forum. Subsequently, workshop field notes were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: Sixty-two hospital staff (n = 42 nurses, n = 12 allied health, n = 8 other) participated in the workshops. Participants considered the implementation process would be enabled at: (1) individual level, by providing accessible and flexible training to optimize staff engagement; (2) ward level, by establishing clear implementation protocols, engaging and supporting team leaders, and (3) ensuring clear communication between staff, patients, and families; and (4) organizational level, by leadership supporting sustained implementation. Group consensus was that it was important to have a single, agreed vision to implement the Safe Recovery Program. Conclusion: Staff engagement facilitated the development of a shared vision and structured plan to implement a patient falls prevention education program on hospital wards. Keywords: falls prevention, patient education, hospitals, care workforce, implementation strategy

Study methods

Three hospital staff workshops were conducted using the world café methodology.29,30 This qualitative method facilitates participant engagement in constructive dialog around critical questions 31 enabling the cross-pollination of ideas in an equitable and non-threatening environment. Unlike a focus group or individual interview where staff are passive participants and do not contribute to data analysis, this approach facilitated timely active collaboration between hospital staff to engage in problem identification, and used collective intelligence to contribute to the planning and design of pragmatic solutions to support the effective implementation of patient falls prevention education within hospital wards. 30

Limitations

A strength was the involvement of diverse hospital staff who were to be directly involved in the education program implementation on their wards; hence, their insights enhanced the credibility of SRP implementation decisions. Involving staff stakeholders improves the likelihood of eventual adoptability and feasibility. Implementation science frameworks explain that stakeholder engagement improves feasibility by ensuring real-world grounding of the strategies and identifying practical challenges prior to commencement. 48 Using a world café to engage staff can be useful for planning implementation as it provides an opportunity for group co-creation of strategies in a rigorous and timely manner and builds ongoing ownership of the implementation.17,30,35

A 90-day district inquiry

Days 1–15 · Appraise. Read the source methods, recruitment, comparator, outcomes and limitations. Record how the study setting differs from your district and which claim the design can support.
Days 16–30 · Design. Choose one school improvement question with teachers. Protect a short shared planning cycle, agree an instructional change and use a common rubric for examining student work. Agree participation, privacy protections, baseline and stopping rules before starting.
Days 31–60 · Observe. Collect the pre-agreed measures, keep a log of implementation changes and invite confidential voluntary feedback. Preserve existing support for staff and learners.
Days 61–90 · Decide. Review implementation fidelity, teacher time and independently scored student work against a recorded baseline. Examine access differences and competing explanations before attributing changes to leadership. Make a dated decision to stop, revise or extend the inquiry.

Board decision brief

Present the local problem, source setting, evidence limits, intervention, responsible owner, total cost, measured changes and uncertainty. Separate staff perceptions, implementation measures and student learning outcomes.

Attribution and reuse

Cheng Yen Loo; Meg E Morris; Jacqueline Francis-Coad; Steffanie Coulter; Hazel Heng; Ron Shorr; Uyen Phan; Carol Watson; Adam Semciw; Catherine M Said; Bodil Rasmussen; Sarah Bunting; Christopher Etherton-Beer; Jeanette Wood; Anne-Marie Hill. Engaging With Hospital Staff to Develop Implementation Strategies For Delivering a Patient Falls Prevention Education Program Using a World Café. Western Journal of Nursing Research (2026-06-24). https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459261449623

Prepared 2026-11-07. Source authorship and DOI are preserved. The abstract and source passages are attributed extracts; this editorial guide is offered under the same CC BY 4.0 license.