Agentic education · Learning science

Actionable companion · Feedback & scaffolding

Learning with agency: Developing Talent with Artificial Intelligence: Human–AI Symbiotic Theory (HAIST) as a Framework for AI-Mediated Learning and Talent Development

AI-assisted editorial implementation guide, separate from the original research. Proposed actions are not claims or recommendations attributed to the source authors. No independent peer review of this guide is asserted.

Read original paperSearch paper agentCC BY 4.0

Evidence and context

Title and abstract screening; stage labels describe reported settings, not verified numerical ages. Design labels require full-text appraisal. Reported stage(s): Adult & professional learning. Verify the participant population and task before transferring the findings.

Original authors’ abstract, reproduced under the linked source license:

Abstract Traditional talent development models were designed before the AI revolution and do not consider artificial agents as possible sources of development. artificial intelligence is quickly infiltrating education spaces—but our thinking about learning has not caught up with how we can productively pair learners with both human and artificial intelligence. Addressing this gap, we introduce Human–AI Symbiotic Theory (HAIST), a novel theoretical framework designed for AI-facilitated environments, which posits how learners can productively leverage both humans and AI as “development partners” across the entire talent development process. We begin with a comprehensive integration of ideas and theory from the literature on talent development, AI for learning, and human–AI collaboration and use these insights to build HAIST for the specific context of talent development. HAIST comprises three mechanisms—Complementary Intelligence Activation (CIA), Dynamic Adaptive Co-Regulation (DACR), and Agency-Preserving Scaffolding (APS)—that are grounded in prior theory and research on topics like sociocultural theory, self-regulated learning, and distributed cognition. We then demonstrate how HAIST can be applied throughout all phases of talent development while highlighting implications for traditionally underserved learners like adult learners, student veterans, multilingual learners, and first-generation learners. We provide an applied example of how the three mechanisms work in tandem to support talent development and discuss points of tension that must be navigated when applying HAIST (e.g., between adaptation and optimization vs. agency). Lastly, we highlight how considerations of ethics and learner rights (algorithmic bias, learner voice, etc.) should be considered when operationalizing HAIST. Overall, HAIST can serve as a foundational theory to not only understand how talent development should occur between learners and both humans and AI, but also to consider the process of instruction design in AI-mediated learning environments. Keywords: Human–AI Symbiotic Theory, HAIST, talent development, adaptive learning, complementary intelligence, cognitive development, AI in education, non-traditional learners, personalized learning

What kind of evidence is this?

Intelligent tutoring & adaptive learning · Design requires full-text appraisal

Stage: Adult & professional learning. Screening labels describe reported context and study-design language. They are not a risk-of-bias rating or proof of effectiveness for an age band.

Limitations and uncertainty · source passage

The AI in education (AIED) literature has expanded rapidly over the last decade, demonstrating benefits of adaptive learning systems, intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), and more recently generative AI tools like LLMs for supporting learning across contexts (VanLehn, 2011; Luckin et al., 2016; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019). By leveraging algorithms that respond to learner performance data, adaptive platforms can deliver increasingly personalized content and instruction. ITS are able to deliver hints and feedback tailored to learners. And today, LLMs are showing remarkable ability to respond to learners’ writing with useful commentary and explanation, model ideas with clarity, converse with students using Socratic techniques, and collaborate creatively with learners.

Design the system before the pilot

Document the learner model, mastery rule, hint sequence and adaptation signal. Compare adaptive routing with the same content in a non-adaptive sequence. Check whether early errors lead to persistent low-expectation pathways.

  • Give feedback on the learner’s reasoning, then fade hints. Record whether the learner can complete the next task without that scaffold.
  • Use plan–attempt–check–reflect prompts and compare confidence with actual performance. Keep learner choice and reflection visible.

A 90-day district pilot

  1. Days 1–15 · Appraise. Have the curriculum lead and a teacher read the methods and limitations. Record the study design, sample, comparator, outcomes and evidence gaps. Define a local question that the study can help inform.
  2. Days 16–30 · Design. Use a bounded job-relevant simulation or professional-development task with an expert supervisor. Require a traceable rationale and verification before any real-world action. Name an accountable owner and set the baseline, success threshold and budget before implementation.
  3. Days 31–60 · Test. Start with a small voluntary cohort, preserve an accessible non-AI route and require teacher review. Use synthetic or de-identified examples; approve data handling and tool terms through district processes.
  4. Days 61–90 · Decide. Assess independent performance on an unfamiliar simulation, retention after a delay, error severity and total review time. Do not equate a faster AI-assisted response with durable professional competence. Compare with baseline, document uncertainty and stop or revise if learning worsens, access is unequal or critical errors persist.

The board decision brief

Report the learning problem, evidence quality, participating population, total cost including review time, measured benefit, errors, access differences and remaining uncertainties. Make a dated recommendation to stop, revise or expand. A positive perception survey alone does not establish learning improvement.

Attribution and reuse

John C Chick; Laura Thomsen Morello. Developing Talent with Artificial Intelligence: Human–AI Symbiotic Theory (HAIST) as a Framework for AI-Mediated Learning and Talent Development. Journal of Intelligence (2026-05-19). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14050086

Companion prepared 2026-10-30. Original authorship and DOI are preserved. The abstract is an attributed source extract; the implementation plan is new AI-assisted editorial material, offered under the same CC BY 4.0 license. This guide has not undergone independent peer review.