Actionable companion · School leadership and instructional improvement
From leadership research to district action: Expanding power and opportunity in public health education: the continuous learning for antiracist culture change fellowship program
AI-assisted editorial implementation guide. Proposed district actions are separate from the original authors’ findings and recommendations. Independent peer review of this guide is not asserted.
Evidence and transfer
Education-related source: verify which participants, institutions and outcomes were actually studied before district adoption. Source publication type: research-article. License and identity checks do not establish study quality or causality.
Original authors’ abstract, reproduced under the source license:
Introduction There is growing student demand in graduate public health education for addressing racism as a determinant of health and educational opportunity. Antiracist pedagogy provides a framework for understanding power and opportunity in public health education and strengthening leadership capacity among faculty and staff. Methods We created a 15-week fellowship program for public health faculty and staff to learn about antiracist frameworks and practices. The program combined asynchronous learning with individualized coaching, peer support, and group activities for fellows. Fellows designed personal contracts to use their learning to effect tangible antiracist changes in their work with students. Results A total of 26 faculty and staff completed the fellowship over four cohorts from September 2023–May 2025. Pre-fellowship, post-fellowship, and one-year post-fellowship survey data revealed significant increases in fellows’ capacity to review course content, teaching methods, and other educational activities to reflect antiracist theory and practice (p = 0.001). Fellows also reported increased expertise, knowledge of review criteria, and preparedness (p < 0.001), and awareness of their strengths and weaknesses in antiracist pedagogy (p = 0.004), as well as increased ability to provide concrete examples of how antiracist pedagogy works in practice (p = 0.003) and to identify specific tools, experts, and resources in antiracist theory and practice (p < 0.001). We observed fewer or less durable changes in other areas, such as fellows’ self-perceived contribution to a culture of self-reflection, learning and continuous improvement, fellows reporting having specific ideas for how to incorporate antiracism into public health education, or fellows being actively involved in colleagues’ and students’ learning and skill development in antiracism. Discussion A cohort-based fellowship combining asynchronous learning and coaching should be considered among the growing number of options for integrating antiracism into public health education. Other universities interested in this model should also take into account lessons learned regarding the length of the program, the degree of independence expected from fellows, participant attrition, and resources available to implement fellowship projects.
Study methods
The development of CLARCC followed the 2021 report of the USC REDI Task Force, in particular its recommendations to integrate racial equity across the curriculum and to provide opportunities for staff and faculty to experience professionally led anti-racist trainings. A faculty coordinator (JEC) and staff coordinator (KDG) with experience leading DEI initiatives both inside and outside USC developed a concept note for an initial 18-month initiative from January 2023 – June 2024. Two additional co-authors (UI and PS) participated as Reference Group members to guide the program (see below), and the remaining two co-authors (RMC and RNB) contributed faculty oversight. The program aimed to:
Limitations
No passage was selected automatically. Inspect the complete source before adopting a practice.
A 90-day district inquiry
- Days 1–15 · Appraise. Read the source methods, recruitment, comparator, outcomes and limitations. Record how the study setting differs from your district and which claim the design can support.
- Days 16–30 · Design. Choose one school improvement question with teachers. Protect a short shared planning cycle, agree an instructional change and use a common rubric for examining student work. Agree participation, privacy protections, baseline and stopping rules before starting.
- Days 31–60 · Observe. Collect the pre-agreed measures, keep a log of implementation changes and invite confidential voluntary feedback. Preserve existing support for staff and learners.
- Days 61–90 · Decide. Review implementation fidelity, teacher time and independently scored student work against a recorded baseline. Examine access differences and competing explanations before attributing changes to leadership. Make a dated decision to stop, revise or extend the inquiry.
Board decision brief
Present the local problem, source setting, evidence limits, intervention, responsible owner, total cost, measured changes and uncertainty. Separate staff perceptions, implementation measures and student learning outcomes.
Attribution and reuse
Jonathan E. Cohen; Karina Dominguez Gonzalez; Ugonna Ihenacho; Pooja Shah; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Ricky N. Bluthenthal. Expanding power and opportunity in public health education: the continuous learning for antiracist culture change fellowship program. Frontiers in Public Health (2026-03-24). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1766034
Prepared 2026-11-07. Source authorship and DOI are preserved. The abstract and source passages are attributed extracts; this editorial guide is offered under the same CC BY 4.0 license.