Generative AI · Education leadership

Actionable companion · Assessment and evidence of learning

From evidence to district action: International Perspectives on Digital and Generative AI Adoption and Governance in Undergraduate Dental Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey

AI-assisted editorial implementation guide. The district actions are proposed applications, not findings or recommendations attributed to the original authors. No additional peer review is asserted.

Read original paperSearch paper agentCC BY 4.0

Evidence and context

Health-professions education context: test transfer to K–12 rather than assuming it.

Original authors’ abstract, reproduced under the linked source license:

Background/Objectives: Digital technologies and generative artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly used in undergraduate dental education, yet international variations in adoption and governance remain insufficiently described. This study aimed to characterise cross-national patterns of educational software use, perceived importance for curriculum delivery, and institutional readiness for AI governance. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey of educators and academic administrators involved in undergraduate dental education captured institutional software use across teaching delivery, learning management, assessment, clinical record systems, imaging, simulation, digital workflows, and generative AI. Results: A total of 97 respondents from 38 countries completed the survey, with most institutions delivering both undergraduate and postgraduate dental education (66.0%). Videoconferencing platforms were widely adopted. LMS provision varied, with Google Classroom, Moodle, and Blackboard most frequently reported. Paper-based clinical records remained in use in 32% of institutions. Among digital PMS/EDR platforms, axiUm, Salud/Titanium, and Carestream Dental were the most prevalent. Adoption of simulation software, CAD/CAM systems, and 3D printing was inconsistent. LMS and videoconferencing were most often rated as essential, whereas simulation, scanners, CAD/CAM, and 3D printing were generally considered useful but not essential. Generative AI use was commonly reported, while formal institutional guidance and policies were frequently absent. Conclusions: Although digital integration in undergraduate dental education is widespread, its distribution is uneven across different regions and technology domains. The combination of rapid generative AI uptake and limited governance highlights an urgent need for institution-level guidance, staff development, and strategic investment to support responsible and equitable integration.

A 90-day district pilot

  1. Days 1–15 · Appraise. Have the curriculum lead and a teacher read the methods and limitations. Record the study design, sample, comparator, outcomes and evidence gaps. Define a local question that the study can help inform.
  2. Days 16–30 · Design. Redesign one low-stakes assessment: require a first attempt, an AI-assisted revision, a source-check log and a short oral explanation. Use the same rubric for the comparison task. Name an accountable owner and set the baseline, success threshold and budget before implementation.
  3. Days 31–60 · Test. Start with a small voluntary cohort, preserve an accessible non-AI route and require teacher review. Use synthetic or de-identified examples; approve data handling and tool terms through district processes.
  4. Days 61–90 · Decide. Blind-score reasoning, factual accuracy and unaided transfer on a fresh task. Record suspected misconduct separately from demonstrated evidence. Compare with baseline, document uncertainty and stop or revise if learning worsens, access is unequal or critical errors persist.

The board decision brief

Report the learning problem, evidence quality, participating population, total cost including review time, measured benefit, errors, access differences and remaining uncertainties. Make a dated recommendation to stop, revise or expand. A positive perception survey alone does not establish learning improvement.

Attribution and reuse

Isabel C. Olegário; Niamh Coffey; Akhilanand Chaurasia; Albert Leung. International Perspectives on Digital and Generative AI Adoption and Governance in Undergraduate Dental Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Dentistry Journal (2026-02-23). https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14020128

Companion prepared 2026-10-30. Original authorship and DOI are preserved. The abstract is an attributed source extract; the implementation plan is new AI-assisted editorial material, offered under the same CC BY 4.0 license. This guide has not undergone independent peer review.