Actionable companion · Feedback & scaffolding
Learning with agency: The Adaptive Lab Mentor (ALM): An AI-Driven IoT Framework for Real-Time Personalized Guidance in Hands-On Engineering Education
AI-assisted editorial implementation guide, separate from the original research. Proposed actions are not claims or recommendations attributed to the source authors. No independent peer review of this guide is asserted.
Evidence and context
Title and abstract screening; stage labels describe reported settings, not verified numerical ages. Design labels require full-text appraisal. Reported stage(s): Age / stage not established. Verify the participant population and task before transferring the findings.
Original authors’ abstract, reproduced under the linked source license:
Abstract Engineering education is based on experiential learning, but the problem is that in laboratory conditions, it is difficult to give feedback to the students in real time and personalize this feedback. The paper introduces the proposal of an innovative approach to the laboratories, called Adaptive Lab Mentor (ALM), which combines the technologies of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and sensor technology to facilitate intelligent and customized laboratory setting. ALM is supported by a new real-time multimodal sensor fusion model in which a sensor-instrumented laboratory is used to record real-time electrical measurements (voltage and current) which are used in parallel with symbolic component measurements (target resistance) with a lightweight, dual-input Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN) running on an edge device. In this initial validation, visual context is presented as a symbolic target value, which establishes a pathway for the future integration of full computer vision. The architecture will enable monitoring of the student progress, making error diagnoses within a short time period, and provision of adaptive feedback based on information available in the context. To test this strategy, a high-fidelity model of an Ohm Laboratory was developed. LTspice was used to generate a huge amount of current and voltage time series of various circuit states. The trained model achieved 93.3% test accuracy and demonstrated that the proposed system could be applied. The ALM model, compared to the current Intelligent Tutoring Systems, is based on physical sensing and edge AI inference in real-time, as well as adaptive and safety-sensitive feedback throughout hands-on engineering demonstrations. The ALM framework serves as a blueprint for the new smart laboratory assistant. Keywords: adaptive learning, intelligent tutoring systems, IoT in education, sensors data analytics, experiential learning
What kind of evidence is this?
Intelligent tutoring & adaptive learning · Design requires full-text appraisal
Stage: Age / stage not established. Screening labels describe reported context and study-design language. They are not a risk-of-bias rating or proof of effectiveness for an age band.
Limitations and uncertainty · source passage
Carrying out a user study amongst engineering students to test the real-time performance of the system, its ability to resist sensor noise, and usability. The important metrics will be the inference latency during load, the false positive/negative rates of the real component, and the user satisfaction scores.
Design the system before the pilot
Document the learner model, mastery rule, hint sequence and adaptation signal. Compare adaptive routing with the same content in a non-adaptive sequence. Check whether early errors lead to persistent low-expectation pathways.
- Give feedback on the learner’s reasoning, then fade hints. Record whether the learner can complete the next task without that scaffold.
A 90-day district pilot
- Days 1–15 · Appraise. Have the curriculum lead and a teacher read the methods and limitations. Record the study design, sample, comparator, outcomes and evidence gaps. Define a local question that the study can help inform.
- Days 16–30 · Design. Treat the paper as background evidence until its population is verified in the full text. Do not assign an age-specific intervention or extend adult results to children. Name an accountable owner and set the baseline, success threshold and budget before implementation.
- Days 31–60 · Test. Start with a small voluntary cohort, preserve an accessible non-AI route and require teacher review. Use synthetic or de-identified examples; approve data handling and tool terms through district processes.
- Days 61–90 · Decide. Extract the participant ages or education stage, recruitment, task and comparator before selecting a local pilot. If these cannot be established, retain the paper for design discussion rather than age-band efficacy claims. Compare with baseline, document uncertainty and stop or revise if learning worsens, access is unequal or critical errors persist.
The board decision brief
Report the learning problem, evidence quality, participating population, total cost including review time, measured benefit, errors, access differences and remaining uncertainties. Make a dated recommendation to stop, revise or expand. A positive perception survey alone does not establish learning improvement.
Attribution and reuse
Md Shakib Hasan; Awais Ahmed; Nouman Rasool; MST Mosaddeka Naher Jabe; Xiaoyang Zeng; Farman Ali Pirzado. The Adaptive Lab Mentor (ALM): An AI-Driven IoT Framework for Real-Time Personalized Guidance in Hands-On Engineering Education. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) (2025-12-18). https://doi.org/10.3390/s25247688
Companion prepared 2026-10-30. Original authorship and DOI are preserved. The abstract is an attributed source extract; the implementation plan is new AI-assisted editorial material, offered under the same CC BY 4.0 license. This guide has not undergone independent peer review.