Agentic education · Learning science

Actionable companion · Cognitive load & attention

Learning with agency: Gestures can help children learn mathematics: how researchers can work with teachers to make gesture studies applicable to classrooms

AI-assisted editorial implementation guide, separate from the original research. Proposed actions are not claims or recommendations attributed to the source authors. No independent peer review of this guide is asserted.

Read original paperSearch paper agentCC BY 4.0

Evidence and context

Title and abstract screening; stage labels describe reported settings, not verified numerical ages. Design labels require full-text appraisal. Reported stage(s): Children · stage unspecified. Verify the participant population and task before transferring the findings.

Original authors’ abstract, reproduced under the linked source license:

The gestures we produce serve a variety of functions—they affect our communication, guide our attention and help us think and change the way we think. Gestures can consequently also help us learn, generalize what we learn and retain that knowledge over time. The effects of gesture-based instruction in mathematics have been well studied. However, few of these studies are directly applicable to classroom environments. Here, we review literature that highlights the benefits of producing and observing gestures when teaching and learning mathematics, and we provide suggestions for designing research studies with an eye towards how gestures can feasibly be applied to classroom learning. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Minds in movement: embodied cognition in the age of artificial intelligence’.

What kind of evidence is this?

Supporting AI learning science · Design requires full-text appraisal

Stage: Children · stage unspecified. Screening labels describe reported context and study-design language. They are not a risk-of-bias rating or proof of effectiveness for an age band.

Study methods · source passage

When conducting experimental studies for publication, researchers often use methods that are rigid and inflexible. The experimenter’s instructions to the teacher and student are commonly scripted to ensure that all students receive the same treatment. In contrast, teachers are trained to differentiate instruction based on their assessment of student needs. The challenge is to incorporate nuance and flexibility into our research studies in the classroom, while at the same time maintaining scientific rigour.

Design the system before the pilot

Use this study to inform a learning mechanism or implementation question. It is not direct evidence that autonomous agents improve learning. Keep the proposed agent behavior separate from what the source actually tested.

  • Limit simultaneous instructions and unnecessary dialogue. Compare task performance and a suitable mental-effort measure; easier-feeling work is not automatically better learning.

A 90-day district pilot

  1. Days 1–15 · Appraise. Have the curriculum lead and a teacher read the methods and limitations. Record the study design, sample, comparator, outcomes and evidence gaps. Define a local question that the study can help inform.
  2. Days 16–30 · Design. Establish the participants’ ages, developmental needs and educational setting from the full paper before selecting an intervention. Use adult-mediated activity and preserve hands-on and peer learning. Name an accountable owner and set the baseline, success threshold and budget before implementation.
  3. Days 31–60 · Test. Start with a small voluntary cohort, preserve an accessible non-AI route and require teacher review. Use synthetic or de-identified examples; approve data handling and tool terms through district processes.
  4. Days 61–90 · Decide. Evaluate an age-appropriate independent task after the interaction. Do not infer a preschool or primary-school effect when the paper does not establish that population. Compare with baseline, document uncertainty and stop or revise if learning worsens, access is unequal or critical errors persist.

The board decision brief

Report the learning problem, evidence quality, participating population, total cost including review time, measured benefit, errors, access differences and remaining uncertainties. Make a dated recommendation to stop, revise or expand. A positive perception survey alone does not establish learning improvement.

Attribution and reuse

Amanda Seccia; Susan Goldin-Meadow. Gestures can help children learn mathematics: how researchers can work with teachers to make gesture studies applicable to classrooms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2024-08-19). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0156

Companion prepared 2026-10-30. Original authorship and DOI are preserved. The abstract is an attributed source extract; the implementation plan is new AI-assisted editorial material, offered under the same CC BY 4.0 license. This guide has not undergone independent peer review.