Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 5 · Parenting and AI II

Volume 2 · Issue 5 · Parenting and AI II

One hundred readings on parenting, children and AI. Explore the system type, study context and limits alongside each source.

100 articles · Page 2 of 5

Edition list · CSV ↓
21

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Qualitative caregiver consultation for ML development

Black and Latinx Primary Caregiver Considerations for Developing and Implementing a Machine Learning–Based Model for Detecting Child Abuse and Neglect With Implications for Racial Bias Reduction: Qualitative Interview Study With Primary Caregivers

Whose understanding of our family enters an AI risk label?

Children attending a pediatric emergency department; exact child ages not specifiedCC BY 4.0Proposed narrow child-protection ML; qualitative design evidenceDirect parenting evidence
Read & explore ↗
22

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Participatory adolescent GenAI co-design workshops

Using Generative AI to Co-Design Digital Mental Health Interventions With Adolescents in Rural South Africa: Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Participatory Workshops

Does an AI creation reflect my teenager’s culture and intentions?

Adolescents aged 15–19 yearsCC BY 4.0Generative text/image AI and algorithmic music generation; supervised workshopsChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
23

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Public-engagement workshops using speculative stories

Technology matters: AI‐driven tools in children's mental healthcare: perspectives from young people and parents

Would our child’s future opportunities be shaped by an AI interpretation of my speech?

Young people aged 13–18 years, plus parents of autistic childrenCC BY 4.0Proposed speech/NLP predictive AI; speculative-story consultationDirect parenting evidence
Read & explore ↗
24

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Toddler diagnostic-model development and subgroup fairness evaluation

Developing an integrated algorithm to support autism diagnostic decisions: Model performance and statistical fairness

Has an autism assessment model been checked for children like ours?

Toddlers aged 15–36 months; mean 30.4 monthsCC BY 4.0Narrow interpretable predictive classification; not generative AIFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
25

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Retrospective pediatric EHR classifier and bias case study

Conceptualizing bias in EHR data: A case study in performance disparities by demographic subgroups for a pediatric obesity incidence classifier

What should we ask when an AI tool is said to be fair for children?

Pediatric patients in a US hospital system; exact age span not specified in this curationCC BY 4.0Narrow EHR-based predictive models; subgroup performance auditFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
26

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Privacy-transformation and crowdsourced ML feature study

Crowdsourced privacy-preserved feature tagging of short home videos for machine learning ASD detection

What privacy protection would be adequate before sharing my child’s video for AI analysis?

Children under eight years in fifty selected home videosCC BY 4.0Narrow ML autism classifier plus human annotation; not LLMFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
27

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Systematic company search and website content analysis

School-Based Online Surveillance of Youth: Systematic Search and Content Analysis of Surveillance Company Websites

What does our school’s AI monitoring see outside the classroom?

Middle- and high-school students; no student participantsCC BY 4.0Commercial automated surveillance/AI claims; no model performance validationChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
28

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Adolescent prototype chatbot survey with interface comparison

Adolescent Perceptions of an Online Safety Chatbot: Survey Study

Can my teenager ask an online-safety bot for help in their own words?

School students with mean age 16.8 yearsCC BY 4.0Older NLP intent classifier with scripted responses; not generative AIChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
29

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Mixed-methods child robot-design preference study

Gender and diagnostic differences in children’s preferences for social robot design. A mixed-methods study with autistic and neurotypical children

Who decides what a child-friendly AI robot should look and feel like?

Autistic children aged 3–14 and neurotypical children aged 6–15CC BY 4.0Social-robot design analysis; no autonomous-system or LLM trialChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
30

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Mixed-methods stakeholder study of ML suicide-risk implementation

Exploring the Perspectives of Pediatric Health Care Providers, Youth Patients, and Caregivers on Machine Learning Suicide Risk Classification: Mixed Methods Study

How would our family be involved if an algorithm flagged a young person’s risk?

Patient interview ages 8–25 years; limited representation under eighteenCC BY 4.0Proposed narrow EHR risk prediction; stakeholder implementation evidenceFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
31

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Normative pediatric bioethics analysis

Paediatric Preference Prediction: the Future of Decision-Making for Children?

Could a prediction about my child’s future wishes outweigh what they say now?

Children and adolescents with different present/future decision-making capacitiesCC BY 4.0Hypothetical narrow AI preference prediction; normative analysisFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
32

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Conceptual ethics and developmental-design analysis

From “quantifying the child” to “supporting the caregiver”: a paradigm evaluation and ethical pathway selection for AI applications in child development

Is this AI helping our family or turning my child into a stream of scores?

Early childhood, especially neurotypical children in consumer home settingsCC BY 4.0Consumer predictive/monitoring AI and hypothetical caregiver assistantsDirect parenting evidence
Read & explore ↗
33

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Conceptual adolescent AI-engagement framework

Supporting Adolescent Engagement with Artificial Intelligence–Driven Digital Health Behavior Change Interventions

What should happen to the traces my teenager leaves while using a health app?

Adolescents, illustrated through alcohol-risk behavior intervention designCC BY 4.0Mixed proposed predictive AI and content-generation roles; conceptual designChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
34

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Systematic review and bibliometric analysis of pediatric AI datasets

A systematic review of data sources for artificial intelligence applications in pediatric brain tumors in Europe: implications for bias and generalizability

Were children like mine represented in the data behind this cancer AI tool?

Pediatric brain-tumor cohorts; twenty included studies also used adult dataCC BY 4.0Mixed narrow predictive/imaging AI; dataset evidence reviewFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
35

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Perspective-based narrative review of global child-health AI

Applied artificial intelligence for global child health: Addressing biases and barriers

Who gains access to the benefits of child-health AI, and who helps design it?

Children and young people in high- and lower-resource health systemsCC BY 4.0Mixed narrow healthcare AI/ML; narrative equity analysisFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
36

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Pediatric-imaging equity position paper and roadmap

Current challenges for global equity related to the implementation of artificial intelligence in pediatric imaging

Could this AI imaging service work fairly for families outside well-resourced hospitals?

Children receiving imaging, especially in low- and middle-income settingsCC BY 4.0Narrow imaging AI/ML; consensus-based equity frameworkFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
37

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Narrative ethical and legal review

Ethical and legal challenges of integrating artificial intelligence into paediatric surgery

What should our family know before a child’s surgery or recordings involve AI?

Children undergoing surgery and adolescents with evolving decision capacityCC BY 4.0Mixed narrow surgical AI and adaptive systems; normative legal reviewFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
38

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Conceptual normative pediatric research-oversight framework

Ethical oversight of AI-driven paediatric trials: a proactive, risk-sensitive interim review model

What should happen if an AI study changes after our child has enrolled?

Pediatric AI research; worked example describes speech therapy ages 3–7CC BY 4.0AI pediatric-trial governance proposal; no model or outcome trialFamily implications
Read & explore ↗
39

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Normative policy and implementation viewpoint

AI Therapy Chatbots in Youth With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Nurse-Led, Risk-Tiered Policy Framework

What safeguards should a school or clinic demonstrate before offering an AI support chatbot?

Children and adolescents with ADHD across home, school, and clinic settingsCC BY 4.0Mixed AI therapy-chatbot designs and adaptive systems; policy analysisChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗
40

Vol. 2 · Issue 5 · Respect · Youth-persona audit of consumer GenAI psychotherapy chatbots

Evaluating Generative AI Psychotherapy Chatbots Used by Youth: Cross-Sectional Study

What happens to private information a teenager shares with an AI companion?

Youth-targeted platforms; raters used simulated youth personas rather than child participantsCC BY 4.0Direct-to-consumer generative AI/LLM companions; simulated-user quality auditChild-facing evidence
Read & explore ↗

Study designs and age labels describe the source. Read each study’s findings and limitations before applying them to your family.