← Collaboration · 20 readings

Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 5 · Licensed source edition

Caregiver Expectations of Interfacing With Voice Assistants to Support Complex Home Care: Mixed Methods Study

Originally published 2022-06-30 · JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Publications Inc. · DOI 10.2196/37688 ↗

CollaborationMixed-methods caregiver expectation studyCC BY 4.0
Ask this paper · Find source passages →

AI / system type

Hypothetical speech/NLP voice-assistant support; no deployed LLM or measured care effect

Family implications

Design, ethics, stakeholder or technical evidence with child/family implications; household benefits are not assumed.

The AI connection

The study elicited expected uses and concerns about AI-enabled voice assistants for documentation and home-care coordination.

Why this reading matters

Useful for defining a family’s preferred boundaries before adding voice technology to a complex care routine.

Editorial reading guide · Collaboration

Which pieces of care coordination would we welcome an assistant helping with, and which decisions should it leave to us?

Separates useful assistance imagined by caregivers from intrusive intervention. Interviews and structured ratings favored reminders and recording/retrieving care information, while unsolicited assistance attracted much less support. The seven child-caregiver accounts make the study relevant to complex home care, with the mixed population kept explicit.

Study context

22 North American adult caregivers: seven family caregivers of children with special needs, nine family caregivers of older adults, and six hired older-adult caregivers

Age / stage: Child ages not reported; child-care subset within a mixed caregiving sample

Read with three questions

  1. Why were reminders and record retrieval more acceptable than unprompted intervention?
  2. How did passive listening, personalization, and control affect expectations?
  3. Which findings came from a mixed caregiving population and still require direct testing with child-caregiving families?

Keep the limits in view

Participants discussed possibilities rather than using a voice assistant in the study. Expectations cannot establish actual usability, reduced care burden, or safety. The small, mostly female sample mixed child, older-adult, and paid care; aggregate preferences should not be attributed to all parents or to children themselves.

The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.

Opening the verified paper and agent…

Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.

Open the repository record

Attribution & reuse

Follow the original.

Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.

Ryan Tennant; Sana Allana; Kate Mercer; Catherine M Burns; Andre Kushniruk; Yaa Kumah-Crystal; Dillon Chrimes (2022). Caregiver Expectations of Interfacing With Voice Assistants to Support Complex Home Care: Mixed Methods Study JMIR Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.2196/37688

Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.