Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 1 · Licensed source edition
Longitudinal Association Between Children’s Callous-Unemotional Traits and Social Competence: Child Executive Function and Maternal Warmth as Moderators
Originally published 2019-02-28 · Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00379 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Kindness
How do we give a child repeated opportunities to notice someone else’s needs?
The authors examine child social competence alongside maternal warmth and callous-unemotional traits.
Who was studied?
643 children in the Panel Study on Korean Children
Age / stage: Childhood
Read with three questions
- How did the authors investigate child social competence alongside maternal warmth and callous-unemotional traits?
- At what ages were each of the family measures and child outcomes actually collected?
- Were callous-unemotional traits, child executive function and warmth rated by the same person?
Keep the limits in view
Associations in this Korean child panel depend on which measure captured social competence and at what point it was measured.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Hyunah Kim; Hyein Chang (2019). Longitudinal Association Between Children’s Callous-Unemotional Traits and Social Competence: Child Executive Function and Maternal Warmth as Moderators Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00379
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.