← Respect · 20 readings

Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 5 · Licensed source edition

Family-supportive manager and perceived pregnancy discrimination: psychological contract breach and trust as mediators of remote working mothers’ turnover intentions

Originally published 2026-10-13 · Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1953215 ↗

RespectTwo-wave online employee surveyCC BY 4.0
Ask this paper · Find source passages →

Working-family evidence

Work, care and the whole person.

Examines pregnancy discrimination, family-supportive management, psychological-contract breach and organizational trust in remote and hybrid work.

Directly examines work and family life, parenting, caregiving or employment policies for families.

Editorial reading guide · Respect

Does remote work protect a pregnant employee from discrimination—or simply move it out of sight?

Examines pregnancy discrimination, family-supportive management, psychological-contract breach and organizational trust in remote and hybrid work.

Study context

406 pregnant or post-maternity-leave women working remotely or in hybrid arrangements.

Age / stage: Pregnant adults and adults returning after maternity leave.

Read with three questions

  1. How did the study separate supportive management from perceived pregnancy discrimination?
  2. What role did psychological-contract breach and trust play in the modeled turnover intentions?
  3. Which manager behaviors could be examined without assuming that an indirect statistical association proves a causal pathway?

Keep the limits in view

Two-wave self-reports and modeled mediation do not establish causality; intentions are not actual turnover and remote-working mothers are not representative of all employees.

The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.

Opening the verified paper and agent…

Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.

Open the repository record

Attribution & reuse

Follow the original.

Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.

Aviv Kidron; Neta Cohen; Michal Gross (2026). Family-supportive manager and perceived pregnancy discrimination: psychological contract breach and trust as mediators of remote working mothers’ turnover intentions Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1953215

Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.