← Trust · 20 readings

Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 1 · Licensed source edition

Comparing the effectiveness of master’s-level clinicians and peer supports for the delivery of attachment and biobehavioral catchup

Originally published 2026-06-05 · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Cambridge University Press · DOI 10.1017/cts.2026.10764 ↗

TrustSecondary comparative analysis of randomized-trial dataCC BY 4.0
Ask this paper · Find source passages →

Editorial reading guide · Trust

Who can deliver sensitive-parenting support, and what evidence is needed to compare providers?

The paper considers access to relationship-focused support by examining different kinds of parent coaches working with families connected to child welfare.

Who was studied?

Seventy-nine caregiver–child dyads receiving ABC from peer specialists or master’s-level clinicians

Age / stage: Young children in an early-childhood parenting intervention

Read with three questions

  1. Was coach qualification itself randomly assigned?
  2. Which parenting outcomes were compared between delivery groups?
  3. What does the modest secondary-analysis sample allow the authors to conclude?

Keep the limits in view

This was a small secondary comparison of provider groups within trial data, not a universal test of coach qualifications. Results from these settings should not be generalized to all programs or child outcomes.

The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.

Opening the verified paper and agent…

Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.

Open the repository record

Attribution & reuse

Follow the original.

Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.

Elisabeth Conradt; Claire Dahl; Kristen Cotton; Erin Hoffman; Evette Horton; Mary Dozier; Danielle S Roubinov (2026). Comparing the effectiveness of master’s-level clinicians and peer supports for the delivery of attachment and biobehavioral catchup Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10764

Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.