← Kindness · 20 readings

Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 4 · Licensed source edition

Do caregiver cooking skills boost adolescent resilience and prosocial behavior? Results from a population-based longitudinal study in Japan

Originally published 2026-05-01 · BMC Psychology
BMC · DOI 10.1186/s40359-026-04658-4 ↗

KindnessCohort analysisCC BY 4.0
Ask this paper · Find source passages →

Editorial reading guide · Kindness

Who benefits when a child helps prepare food for the family?

The authors examine everyday caregiving through cooking and later child prosocial behavior.

Who was studied?

Japanese fourth-grade students and caregivers in the A-CHILD cohort

Age / stage: 9–10 years at baseline

Read with three questions

  1. How did the authors investigate everyday caregiving through cooking and later child prosocial behavior?
  2. At what ages were each of the family measures and child outcomes actually collected?
  3. Which features of shared meals or family circumstances could travel together with cooking skills?

Keep the limits in view

Cooking skills can reflect resources, time and food access. A longitudinal association does not isolate cooking as the source of a change.

The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.

Opening the verified paper and agent…

Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.

Open the repository record

Attribution & reuse

Follow the original.

Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.

Yukako Tani; Aya Isumi; Takeo Fujiwara (2026). Do caregiver cooking skills boost adolescent resilience and prosocial behavior? Results from a population-based longitudinal study in Japan BMC Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04658-4

Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.