Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Effectiveness of a family–school–community collaborative physical activity intervention
Originally published 2026-02-27 · Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1767961 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Collaboration
What opportunities to be active can home and school create together?
The intervention linked school, family and community settings over an academic year to encourage physical activity. Its components should be examined together when interpreting outcomes.
Who was studied?
515 fifth-grade pupils at a public primary school in Guangdong, China.
Age / stage: Ages ten to eleven
Read with three questions
- Which parts of the intervention could the study evaluate separately?
- How were participants assigned, and what differed between the comparison conditions?
- Where do children, families and educators each have a voice in the evidence?
Keep the limits in view
Group comparisons can be affected by baseline differences or concurrent support. Effects of a multicomponent program may not identify a single active ingredient.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Lin Kong; Xinyu Chen; Binping Gong; Xiqian Zhang; Mingming Guo (2026). Effectiveness of a family–school–community collaborative physical activity intervention Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1767961
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.