← Independence · 20 readings

Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition

How does organizational AI adoption affect employees’ job crafting behaviors? An approach-avoidance perspective

Originally published 2026-01-09 · Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1690238 ↗

IndependenceThree-wave employee surveyCC BY 4.0
Ask this paper · Find source passages →

AI / system type

Organizational AI adoption and approach/avoidance job crafting

Workplace evidence

Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.

The AI connection

System or context examined: Organizational AI adoption and approach/avoidance job crafting. The source-specific system and study design determine what can be inferred.

Why this reading matters

The reading brings approach and avoidance motivation during AI-related job crafting into a concrete discussion of humane work during technological change. It offers three-wave employee survey evidence or analysis, not a promise of organizational or family benefit.

Workplace evidence

Work, care and the whole person.

The workplace lens is approach and avoidance motivation during AI-related job crafting. Source setting or population: 487 valid responses from employees in five Chinese enterprises actively using AI. Parenting and child-development outcomes are not inferred from the workplace evidence.

Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.

Editorial reading guide · Independence

Can I adapt my role to AI while keeping choices about the work I do?

This three-wave employee survey examines approach and avoidance motivation during AI-related job crafting. Its TRICK home is Independence, an editorial reading path rather than a claim that the paper tests the full framework.

Study context

487 valid responses from employees in five Chinese enterprises actively using AI

Age / stage: Adult workplace context; no child age range inferred

Read with three questions

  1. Can I adapt my role to AI while keeping choices about the work I do?
  2. What do this study’s design and population — 487 valid responses from employees in five Chinese enterprises actively using AI — allow you to infer about another workplace?
  3. When considering approach and avoidance motivation during AI-related job crafting, which decisions would need employee input before applying this reading to a working family’s circumstances?

Keep the limits in view

The observed motivational pathways are not causal effects; respondents’ perceptions may differ across tasks, companies and local labor conditions.

The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.

Opening the verified paper and agent…

Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.

Open the repository record

Attribution & reuse

Follow the original.

Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.

Qi Liu; Qing Tian; Xin Li; Hongjuan Tan (2026). How does organizational AI adoption affect employees’ job crafting behaviors? An approach-avoidance perspective Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1690238

Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.