Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Emotion Socialization Under One Roof: How Parental Response Patterns Shape Adolescent Emotional Well-Being
Originally published 2025-07-22 · Behavioral Sciences
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) · DOI 10.3390/bs15080999 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Respect
Does my child feel equally free to show joy, sadness and anger around me?
The analysis separates parents’ reactions to happiness, sadness and anger within the same household.
Who was studied?
Adolescents who rated responses from mothers and fathers, with additional family information from mothers.
Age / stage: Adolescence
Read with three questions
- Did the response profiles look the same for joy, sadness and anger?
- Whose perspective is represented by the ratings, and whose perspective is missing?
- Does my child feel equally free to show joy, sadness and anger around me?
Keep the limits in view
Reports from this sample may reflect who participated and how the questions were worded. Associations alone do not establish that a parenting response caused the outcome.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Huiyuan Gao; Yue Guan; Wenyue Pei; Yuhan Gao; Jiayue Mao; Suqun Liao; Can Zeng; Gengfeng Niu (2025). Emotion Socialization Under One Roof: How Parental Response Patterns Shape Adolescent Emotional Well-Being Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15080999
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.