Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Teachers’ emotional labor in parent–teacher interactions: key elements and theoretical logic from a grounded theory approach
Originally published 2025-08-05 · Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1639197 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Collaboration
What makes a parent–teacher conversation easier to sustain when people disagree?
The study describes the emotional work behind contact between teachers and families. A conversation that looks simple from home can require considerable effort at school.
Who was studied?
Twenty teachers in China took part in semi-structured interviews about parent–teacher interactions.
Age / stage: Primary and secondary school
Read with three questions
- Whose emotional work is visible in the interviews?
- How did the researchers move from individual accounts to their interpretation?
- Where do children, families and educators each have a voice in the evidence?
Keep the limits in view
The accounts document experiences in the circumstances studied. They cannot establish how common an experience is in the wider population or measure an intervention effect.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Li Zhai; Chen Guo (2025). Teachers’ emotional labor in parent–teacher interactions: key elements and theoretical logic from a grounded theory approach Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1639197
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.