Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Encourage or Reject Employee Involvement: Value Creation in Human Resource Management in the AI Era—An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Enterprises and Employees
Originally published 2024-12-18 · Behavioral Sciences
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) · DOI 10.3390/bs14121220 ↗
AI / system type
AI involvement in human resource management value co-creation
Workplace evidenceExamines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
The AI connection
System or context examined: AI involvement in human resource management value co-creation. The source-specific system and study design determine what can be inferred.
Why this reading matters
The reading brings enterprise–employee cooperation and benefit sharing around AI into a concrete discussion of humane work during technological change. It offers evolutionary game model with numerical simulation evidence or analysis, not a promise of organizational or family benefit.
Workplace evidence
Work, care and the whole person.
The workplace lens is enterprise–employee cooperation and benefit sharing around AI. Source setting or population: Modeled strategic interactions between enterprises and employees. Parenting and child-development outcomes are not inferred from the workplace evidence.
Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
Editorial reading guide · Collaboration
Who shares the benefits when employers and employees create value with AI?
This evolutionary game model with numerical simulation examines enterprise–employee cooperation and benefit sharing around AI. Its TRICK home is Collaboration, an editorial reading path rather than a claim that the paper tests the full framework.
Study context
Modeled strategic interactions between enterprises and employees
Age / stage: Adult workplace context; no child age range inferred
Read with three questions
- Who shares the benefits when employers and employees create value with AI?
- What do this study’s design and population — Modeled strategic interactions between enterprises and employees — allow you to infer about another workplace?
- When considering enterprise–employee cooperation and benefit sharing around AI, which decisions would need employee input before applying this reading to a working family’s circumstances?
Keep the limits in view
Simulation equilibria follow the model’s assumptions; they are not observed probabilities or a tested workplace policy.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Xiaowei Yang; Shumin Yan (2024). Encourage or Reject Employee Involvement: Value Creation in Human Resource Management in the AI Era—An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Enterprises and Employees Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121220
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.