Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Which factors accompany maternal acceptance-rejection in children with specific learning disabilities?
Originally published 2024-02-13 · BMC Psychiatry
BMC · DOI 10.1186/s12888-024-05584-8 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Kindness
How do we make acceptance clear when a school task is difficult?
This article addresses maternal acceptance and rejection in a family setting shaped by learning difficulties.
Who was studied?
266 children with specific learning disabilities and their mothers
Age / stage: 7–17 years
Read with three questions
- How did the authors investigate maternal acceptance and rejection in a family setting shaped by learning difficulties?
- Whose report describes the parent, the child and the outcome, and where might those reports differ?
- Were mothers’ ratings of acceptance or rejection and their ratings of child difficulties collected independently?
Keep the limits in view
The sample included children diagnosed with specific learning disabilities. Reported associations cannot be assumed for children without that diagnosis.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Ganime Ayar; Sıddıka Songül Yalçın; Özge Tanıdır Artan; Ahmet Kahveci; Esra Çöp (2024). Which factors accompany maternal acceptance-rejection in children with specific learning disabilities? BMC Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05584-8
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.