Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Occupational Safety and Health Equity Impacts of Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review
Originally published 2023-06-24 · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) · DOI 10.3390/ijerph20136221 ↗
AI / system type
AI applications affecting occupational safety and health equity
Workplace evidenceExamines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
The AI connection
System or context examined: AI applications affecting occupational safety and health equity. The source-specific system and study design determine what can be inferred.
Why this reading matters
The reading brings equity in the occupational health benefits and risks of AI into a concrete discussion of humane work during technological change. It offers scoping review evidence or analysis, not a promise of organizational or family benefit.
Workplace evidence
Work, care and the whole person.
The workplace lens is equity in the occupational health benefits and risks of AI. Source setting or population: 113 articles on artificial intelligence, occupational safety and health equity. Parenting and child-development outcomes are not inferred from the workplace evidence.
Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
Editorial reading guide · Respect
Who benefits from safer AI-supported work, and who might be left behind?
This scoping review examines equity in the occupational health benefits and risks of AI. Its TRICK home is Respect, an editorial reading path rather than a claim that the paper tests the full framework.
Study context
113 articles on artificial intelligence, occupational safety and health equity
Age / stage: Workplace literature or conceptual analysis; no single child age range
Read with three questions
- Who benefits from safer AI-supported work, and who might be left behind?
- What do this study’s design and population — 113 articles on artificial intelligence, occupational safety and health equity — allow you to infer about another workplace?
- When considering equity in the occupational health benefits and risks of AI, which decisions would need employee input before applying this reading to a working family’s circumstances?
Keep the limits in view
Scoping coverage and heterogeneous evidence do not establish an equitable effect of any particular AI deployment.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Elizabeth Fisher; Michael A Flynn; Preethi Pratap; Jay A Vietas (2023). Occupational Safety and Health Equity Impacts of Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20136221
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.