Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Employees’ Appraisals and Trust of Artificial Intelligences’ Transparency and Opacity
Originally published 2023-04-20 · Behavioral Sciences
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) · DOI 10.3390/bs13040344 ↗
AI / system type
Transparent versus opaque AI decision agents
Workplace evidenceExamines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
The AI connection
System or context examined: Transparent versus opaque AI decision agents. The source-specific system and study design determine what can be inferred.
Why this reading matters
The reading brings transparent versus opaque AI decisions and employee threat appraisals into a concrete discussion of humane work during technological change. It offers online hypothetical-scenario experiment evidence or analysis, not a promise of organizational or family benefit.
Workplace evidence
Work, care and the whole person.
The workplace lens is transparent versus opaque AI decisions and employee threat appraisals. Source setting or population: 375 participants with work experience. Parenting and child-development outcomes are not inferred from the workplace evidence.
Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
Editorial reading guide · Trust
What information would help me judge an AI decision instead of simply accepting it?
This online hypothetical-scenario experiment examines transparent versus opaque AI decisions and employee threat appraisals. Its TRICK home is Trust, an editorial reading path rather than a claim that the paper tests the full framework.
Study context
375 participants with work experience
Age / stage: Adult workplace context; no child age range inferred
Read with three questions
- What information would help me judge an AI decision instead of simply accepting it?
- What do this study’s design and population — 375 participants with work experience — allow you to infer about another workplace?
- When considering transparent versus opaque AI decisions and employee threat appraisals, which decisions would need employee input before applying this reading to a working family’s circumstances?
Keep the limits in view
A hypothetical experiment measures responses to scenarios, not sustained trust or wellbeing during a real organizational rollout.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Liangru Yu; Yi Li; Fan Fan (2023). Employees’ Appraisals and Trust of Artificial Intelligences’ Transparency and Opacity Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040344
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.