Research reading 056 / Actors / 2024

Wind Shear Operation-Based Competency Assessment Model for Civil Aviation Pilots

Source authors: Fan Li; Xuezhi Xu; Jiayuan Li; Huiyun Hu; Mingda Zhao; Hong Sun

Originally published in Aerospace · 2024

An annotated reading guide. The full source article is available through the original publication link above.

Paper AgentAsk this paper.Explore evidence, limits & sources

Journal reading guide + source metadata

Find passages you can follow back to their source. This reading companion searches this record; it does not invent answers or provide an operational flight briefing.

Source coverage & reuse

Wind Shear Operation-Based Competency Assessment Model for Civil Aviation Pilots
Fan Li; Xuezhi Xu; Jiayuan Li; Huiyun Hu; Mingda Zhao; Hong Sun

The guide and its evidence limits are journal annotations, not quotations from the original researchers. The complete original paper is not currently in this agent’s searchable context.

Open original source ↗ · CC BY 4.0

A1 Curriculum, instructors and assessment

Why read this for flight training?

Develops observable behavior indicators for wind-shear scenarios. Useful for showing how a training objective becomes a structured assessment rubric.

How to interpret the evidence

Agreement with examiners in the evaluated data requires confirmation in other cohorts and scenarios.

Screening basis: Abstract screened. This annotation identifies relevance and limits; it does not replace appraisal of the original methods and findings.

Cite the original article

Fan Li; Xuezhi Xu; Jiayuan Li; Huiyun Hu; Mingda Zhao; Hong Sun (2024). Wind Shear Operation-Based Competency Assessment Model for Civil Aviation Pilots. Aerospace, 11(5), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11050363

Publication record

The original paper retains its published authors, venue and DOI. This journal’s reading guide was prepared with AI assistance under the editorial direction of Dr. Freedom Cheteni. The source authors are not credited as authors of this annotation. No new peer review or DOI is claimed for the guide.

Continue this chapter