Paper Agent CC BY 3.0

Bidirectional influences of information sampling and concept learning.

Braunlich K, Love BC.

Live workspace

Ask the licensed paper

Ready now

Source context

Contemporary models of categorization typically tend to sidestep the problem of how information is initially encoded during decision making. Instead, a focus of this work has been to investigate how, through selective attention, stimulus representations are "contorted" such that behaviorally relevant dimensions are accentuated (or "stretched"), and the representations of irrelevant dimensions are ignored (or "compressed"). In high-dimensional real-world environments, it is computationally infeasible to sample all available information, and human decision makers selectively sample information from sources expected to provide relevant information. To address these and other shortcomings, we develop an active sampling model, Sampling Emergent Attention (SEA), which sequentially and strategically samples information sources until the expected cost of information exceeds the expected benefit. The model specifies the interplay of two components, one involved in determining the expected utility of different information sources and the other in representing knowledge and beliefs about the environment. These two components interact such that knowledge of the world guides information sampling, and what is sampled updates knowledge. Like human decision makers, the model displays strategic sampling behavior, such as terminating information search when sufficient information has been sampled and adaptively adjusting the search path in response to previously sampled information. The model also shows human-like failure modes. For example, when information exploitation is prioritized over exploration, the bidirectional influences between information sampling and learning can lead to the development of beliefs that systematically differ from reality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

How this agent works

It searches only this paper’s licensed source text, returns matching passages, and refuses to invent an answer when the record is silent.

Original journal: Psychological review
Published: 2021-07-19
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000287
Open record: PMC8766620

Read full article Open PDF Canonical source

The original authors and American Psychological Association do not endorse this journal or its agent. Verify findings in the canonical article before making consequential decisions.